EC Dental Science

Dental fluorosis is a common developmental condition affecting both primary and permanent dentitions, with more pronounced consequences in permanent teeth due to their lifelong function. In most cases, patients primarily seek treatment for esthetic concerns, while restorative interventions, once initiated, often entail long-term maintenance. Consequently, when functional impairment is minimal, treatment planning should favor minimally invasive strategies; however, in more advanced cases, aggressive approaches may be required, and patients should be thoroughly informed of the associated risks. The choice of treatment is therefore largely guided by the severity of the condition, with ceramic veneers frequently considered the treatment of choice for moderate to severe fluorosis owing to their superior esthetic properties, durability, biocompatibility, and predictable long-term performance. This case report describes the partial management of generalized dental fluorosis in a 36-year- old Tunisian female patient using ceramic veneers. The patient presented to the dental clinic of Monastir with the main complaints of an unaesthetic smile and generalized tooth discoloration.

Keywords: Dental Fluorosis; Smile Rehabilitation; Porcelain Veneers; Tooth Discoloration; Aesthetic Treatment

1. Martignon S., et al. “Epidemiology of erosive tooth wear, dental fluorosis and molar incisor hypomineralization in the American continent”. Caries Research1 (2021): 1-11.
2. Aoun A., et al. “The fluoride debate: the pros and cons of fluoridation”. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 3 (2018): 171-180.
3. DenBesten P and Li W. “Chronic fluoride toxicity: dental fluorosis”. Monographs in Oral Science 22 (2011): 81-96.
4. Farid H and Khan FR. “Clinical management of severe fluorosis in an adult”. BMJ Case Reports (2012): bcr2012007138.
5. Arbab Chirani R and Foray H. “[Dental fluorosis: etiological diagnosis]”. Archives of Pediatrics 3 (2005): 284-287.
6. Revelo-Mejía IA., et al. “Dental fluorosis: the risk of misdiagnosis-a review”. Biological Trace Element Research 5 (2021): 1762-1770.
7. Shahroom NSB., et al. “Interventions in management of dental fluorosis, an endemic disease: A systematic review”. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 10 (2019): 3108-3113.
8. Oliveira A., et al. “Dental bleaching, microabrasion, and resin infiltration: case report of minimally invasive treatment of enamel hypoplasia”. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1 (2020): 105-110.
9. Henry DB. “The restorative cycle in dentistry”. Todays FDA1 (2014): 58- 61, 63.
10. Rozier RG. “Epidemiologic indices for measuring the clinical manifestations of dental fluorosis: overview [10]. and critique”. Advances in Dental Research 1 (1994): 39-55.
11. “Public Health Weekly Reports for AUGUST 19, 1938”. Public Health Reports (1896)33 (1938): 1443-1498.
12. Greenwall-Cohen J., et al. “Tooth whitening for the under-18-year-old patient”. British Dental Journal 1 (2018): 19-26.
13. Zotti F., et al. “Resin infiltration in dental fluorosis treatment-1-year follow-up”. Medicina (Kaunas)1 (2020): 22.
14. Jhajharia K., et al. “Aesthetic management of fluoresced teeth with ceramic veneers and direct composite bonding - an overview and a case presentation”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 6 (2015): ZD28-ZD30.
15. Peumans M., et al. “Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature”. Journal of Dentistry3 (2000): 163-177.
16. Magne P and Douglas WH. “Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics2 (1999): 111-121.
17. Núbia Pavesi Pini., et al. “Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques”. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry 4 (2012): 9-16.
18. Belser UC., et al. “Ceramic laminate veneers: continuous evolution of indications”. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 4 (1997): 197-207.
19. Calamia JR and Calamia CS. “Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success”. Dental Clinics of North America 2 (2007): 399-417.
20. Della Bona A. “Bonding to ceramics: scientific evidences for clinical dentistry”. São Paulo: Artes Médicas (2009).
21. Radz GM. “Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations”. Dental Clinics of North America 2 (2011): 353-370.
22. Giordano R and McLaren EA. “Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods”. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 9 (2010): 682-684.
23. Kelly JR and Benett P. “Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice”. Australian Dental Journal 1 (2011): 84-96.
24. Moraes RR., et al. “Light-activation of resin cement trough ceramic: relationship between irradiance intensity and bond strength to dentin”. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B 1 (2008): 160-165.
25. Radovic I., et al. “Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review”. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2008): 251-258.
26. Linden JJ., et al. “Photo-activation of resin cements through porcelain veneers”. Journal of Dental Research 2 (1991): 154-157.
27. McLaren EA and Whiteman YY. “Ceramics: rationale for material selection”. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 9 (2010): 666-668.
28. Beier US., et al. “Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics1 (2012): 79-85.