Mini Review Volume 23 Issue 11 - 2024

Basal vs. Conventional Implants: The Battle for Better Bone Integration

Arjun Machingal Raveendran1, Subair Kayakool2, Marjana Shukoor3*, Zaina Kaliparambu Haris4 and Viswavinodini R4

1Reader, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India

2Professor, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India

3Post Graduate Resident, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India

43rd Year Undergraduate, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India

*Corresponding Author: Marjana Shukoor, Post Graduate Resident, Department of Periodontics, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Mahe, Puducherry, India.
Received: September 25, 2024; Published: December 01, 2024



Dental implants are widely used to restore missing teeth, with conventional crestal implants being the most common. However, conventional implants require sufficient bone volume, often necessitating bone augmentation, which increases treatment complexity, risk, and cost. Basal implants, developed to address the limitations of conventional implants, are particularly effective in atrophied jaws with inadequate bone. Unlike conventional implants that rely on the crestal bone, basal implants utilize the basal cortical bone, which is more resistant to resorption and infection. Basal implants also allow for immediate loading, reducing treatment time and improving patient outcomes. Although basal implants offer several advantages, such as reduced surgical complications and suitability for compromised bone conditions, they also have limitations, including patient discomfort and technique sensitivity. Further clinical studies are necessary to validate the long-term efficacy and safety of basal implants as a viable alternative to conventional implantology.

 Keywords: Basal Implants; Implants; Osseointegration; Inadequate Bone; BOI

  1. María B and Guglielmotti DG. “Research on implants and osseointegration”. Periodontology 20001 (2019): 178-189.
  2. Ozkan A., et al. “Dental implants and implant coatings: A focus on their toxicity and safety”. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology, and Oncology 2 (2023): 31-48.
  3. Ali SM., et al. “Comparison between basal and conventional implants as a treatment modality in atrophied ridges”. Journal of Dental Implant Research2 (2019): 48-54.
  4. Gupta AD., et al. “Basal osseointegrated implants: classification and review”. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 11 (2017): 2329-2335.
  5. Patel Kiran Madan., et al. “Basal implants: An asset for rehabilitation of atrophied resorbed maxillary and mandibular jaw - a prospective study”. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery1 (2021): 64-69.
  6. Kumar K., et al. “Basal implants-A new era of prosthodontic dentistry”. IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 1 (2020): 1-3.
  7. Prasad S., et al. “Basal implants: an alternative treatment modality to conventional dental implants”. IDA,W.B 1 (2018): 12-17.
  8. Habash G., et al. “Literature review regarding the applicability and clinical outcome of basal implant”. The Open Dentistry Journal1 (2024).
  9. Pathania N., et al. “Basal implants-A blessing for atrophied ridges”. IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry1 (2021): 16-21.
  10. Swathi A., et al. “An insight into basal implants”. International Journal Dental and Medical Sciences Research2 (2023): 973-978.

Marjana Shukoor., et al. “Basal vs. Conventional Implants: The Battle for Better Bone Integration”. EC Dental Science  23.11 (2024): 01-04.