EC Dental Science

Review Article Volume 20 Issue 11 - 2021

Abutment Selection in Fixed Partial Dentures

Mohamed Hany Ahmad Fouad1, Ibrahim Mohammed H Al Yami2, Rakan Mohammed Alharbi2, Omar Mohammad Dad2, Fatimah Khaled Alshnqity2, Mohammed Khalif Aldhafeeri2, Nawaf Abdulaziz Alsowaiegh2, Talal Abdulaziz Almohana3, Khalid Fahad Alsarrani3, Fesal Suleman Alsalem4, Saleh Abdulmohsen Alfaleh4, Reem Atean Alsafari5, Salsabil Mohammed Alkhalifah6, Yasmin Ahmad Alsubhi7, and Rakan Siraj Alsulaimani8

1 Cairo University, Egypt
2 Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
3 Taibah University Dental College, Saudi Arabia
4 Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Saudi Arabia
5 Batterjee Medical College, Saudi Arabia
6 Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
7 Vision College, Saudi Arabia
8 King Abdulaziz Medical City, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author:Mohammed Hany Ahmad Fouad, Professor of Restorative Dentistry, Registered in Saudi Commission for Health Specialties as Consultant and Cairo University, Egypt. Number: 05JD0323. E-mail: abdelghanymohamedhany@gmail.com
Received: October 09, 2021; Published: October 28, 2021



Introduction: The most common treatment option for the replacement of a single missing tooth is a Fixed Partial Denture (FPD), where support is taken from the two adjacent teeth, and the missing tooth is replaced. Abutment teeth are exposed to forces applied on the missing tooth as well as those applied on the various parts of the prostheses and the abutment teeth themselves, and therefore prior examination of the abutment teeth is of utmost importance.

Aim of Work: This review aims at highlighting an overview of the selection of Abutment teeth for Fixed Partial Dentures. Methodology: This review is comprehensive research of PUBMED and Google Scholar from the years 1990 to 2021.

Conclusion: Planning of a Fixed Partial Denture should always be executed as a multidisciplinary approach keeping the abutment teeth’ pulpal and periodontal health in mind. The diagnosis of the case and thorough study of the diagnostic cats and radiographs is the primary step that helps decide the feasibility of the treatment option. Once the case has been taken up for a fixed prosthesis, the abutment teeth should be examined in detail regarding their crown height, crown root ratio, root configuration, mobility, etc. For a good prognosis, patients’ compliance is of utmost importance, and hence patient education regarding good oral hygiene and maintenance of the prosthesis should also be given equal importance.

Keywords: Abutment; Crown Root Ratio; Clinical Crown; Biological Width; Telescopic Crown

  1. Talabani R M. “Influence of abutment evaluation on designing of fixed partial denture: A clinical study”. International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research 3 (2016): 2395-7387.
  2. Shillingburg H T., et al. “Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics Quintessence Publishing Company 194 (1997).
  3. Akulwar R S and Kodgi A. “Non-rigid connector for managing pier abutment in FPD: A case report”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR 8.7 (2014): ZD12.
  4. Singh S and Singh N. “Treatment planning for fixed partial dentures”. International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research 2.2 (2015): 99-101.
  5. Sarment DP and Misch CE. “Diagnostic casts and surgical templates. Contemporary Implant Dentistry”. 3rd edition. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier (2008): 280.
  6. Goga R and Purton DG. “The use of endodontically treated teeth as abutments for crowns, fixed partial dentures, or removable partial dentures: a literature review”. Quintessence International 38.2 (2007).
  7. Ante I H. “Abutments”. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 2.249 (1936): 2.
  8. Al-Quran F A., et al. “Single-tooth replacement: factors affecting different prosthetic treatment modalities”. BMC Oral Health 11.1 (2011): 1-7.
  9. University of California, San Francisco. School of Dentistry. Postgraduate Education, Stallard H, and McCollum B B. A Syllabus on Oral Rehabilitation and Occlusion. University of California, School of Dentistry (1959).
  10. Lauret J F and Le Gall M G. “The function of mastication: a key determinant of dental occlusion”. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry: PPAD 8.8 (1996): 807-817.
  11. Sumeet S., et al. “Abutment evaluation--A boon to success of fixed partial denture”. Journal of Dental Herald 1.2 (2014): 38-42.
  12. Academy of Prosthodontics. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. Mosby (1999).
  13. Grossmann Y and Sadan A. “The prosthodontic concept of crown-to-root ratio: a review of the literature”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 93.6 (2005): 559-562.
  14. Dykema RW., et al. “Johnston’s modern practice in fixed prosthodontics”. 4th edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders (1986): 8-21.
  15. Shillingburg H T., et al. “Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics”. Quintessence Publishing Company 194 (1997)
  16. Kalra D., et al. “Anthrometric measurements of external ear: An in vivo study”. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Medicines and Dental Care 2.3 (2015): 10-16.
  17. Subhashini M R., et al. “Abutment selection in fixed partial denture-A review”. Drug Invention Today 10.1 (2018).
  18. Hemmings K and Harrington Z. “Replacement of missing teeth with fixed prostheses”. Dental Update 31.3 (2004): 137-141.
  19. Revah A., et al. “The tilted posterior tooth. Part III: Abutment for a fixed partial denture”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 54.3 (1985): 325-330.
  20. Bayer S., et al. “Retention force measurement of telescopic crowns”. Clinical Oral Investigations 14.5 (2010): 607-611.
  21. Son K and Lee KB. “Effect of finish line locations of tooth preparation on the accuracy of intraoral scanners”. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 24.1 (2021): 29-40.
  22. Miller LL. “Tooth preparation and the design of metal substructures”. In Dental ceramics: proceedings of the first International Symposium on Ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc (1983): 196-204.

Mohammed Hany Ahmad Fouad., et al. “Abutment Selection in Fixed Partial Dentures”. EC Dental Science 20.11 (2021): 75-82