Review Article Volume 25 Issue 4 - 2026

A Comparative Analysis of the Most Common Obturation Techniques in Endodontics

Suneeth Shetty1* and Harshita Prem2

1Reader, Affiliated with Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS University, Mysore, Karnataka, India
2Post Graduate Student, Department of Implantology, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India

*Corresponding Author: Suneeth Shetty, Reader, Affiliated with Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental Col- lege and Hospital, JSS University, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Received: January 24, 2026; Published: April 03, 2026



The quality of root canal obturation has a significant impact on the outcome of endodontic treatment. By hermetically sealing the root canal system after it has been cleaned and sculpted, obturation helps to promote periapical healing and stop microbial infiltration. There are many different obturation processes available, from sophisticated thermoplasticized and bioceramic-based approaches to conventional cold lateral compaction. The classification, comparison, benefits, and drawbacks of various methods are examined in this article, which offers a thorough analysis based on the most recent data [1].

Keywords: Root Canal Obturation; Endodontic Treatment; Cold Lateral Compaction; Thermoplasticized Techniques

  1. Ingle JI., et al. “Ingle's endodontics”. 6th PMPH USA (2008).
  2. Schäfer E and Zandbiglari T. “A comparison of the sealing ability of three different obturation techniques”. International Endodontic Journal 7 (2008): 622-628.
  3. Gordon MPJ., et al. “An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals”. International Endodontic Journal 2 (2005): 87-96.
  4. de Deus G., et al. “A laboratory analysis of gutta-percha-filled area obtained using Thermafil, System B and lateral condensation”. International Endodontic Journal 4 (2012): 302-308.
  5. Gharib SR., et al. “An evaluation of root canal filling with the Thermafil obturation technique using micro-CT”. Journal of Endodontics8 (2007): 962-965.
  6. Wolcott J and Himel V. “Treatment of two molars with severe dilacerations using a modified ProTaper technique and Thermafil obturation”. General Dentistry 3 (2001): 282-285.
  7. Zhang W., et al. “Ex vivo cytotoxicity of a new calcium silicate-based root canal sealer on L929 cell line”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 6 (2009): e66-e72.
  8. Viapiana R., et al. “Physicochemical and mechanical properties of zirconium oxide and niobium oxide used as radiopacifiers in MTA”. International Endodontic Journal 6 (2014): 561-570.
  9. Peters OA and Barbakow F. “Filling root canals with thermoplasticized gutta-percha: A novel technique”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2001): 456-458.
  10. Tay FR and Pashley DH. “Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal”. Journal of Endodontics4 (2007): 391-398.
  11. Cohen S and Hargreaves KM. “Pathways of the Pulp (11th edition)”. Elsevier (2016).
  12. Siqueira JF and Rôças IN. “Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures”. Journal of Endodontics11 (2008): 1291-1301.
  13. Pommel L and Camps J. “In vitro apical leakage of system B, continuous wave of condensation, and lateral condensation”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2001): 449-451.
  14. Kececi AD and Kereksu S. “Evaluation of apical leakage of various root canal sealers”. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica4 (2009): 205-209.

Suneeth Shetty and Harshita Prem. “A Comparative Analysis of the Most Common Obturation Techniques in Endodontics”. EC Dental Science 25.4 (2026): 01-05.