1Internal Medicine Department, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nabuls, Palestine
2Internal Medicine Department, Nasser Medical Complex, Ministry of Health, Khan Younis, Palestine
3Anesthesia and ICU Department, Shifa Medical Complex, Ministry of Health, Gaza, Palestine
4Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine
Background: Hyperglycemia is a common and serious complication among patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Several insulin regimens exist for inpatient glycemic control, yet comparative evidence specific to ACS remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of four commonly used insulin strategies-Sliding Scale (SS), Basal-Bolus (BB), Carbohydrate Index-based dosing (CI), and Premixed insulin (PM)-in managing hyperglycemia among ACS patients in Gaza hospitals.
Methods: A multimodal comparative study was conducted at Shifa Medical Complex and European Gaza Hospital from January 2023 to January 2024. A total of 350 ACS patients with hyperglycemia were included and allocated into four insulin-regimen groups based on clinical practice: SS (n = 110), BB (n = 95), CI (n = 75), and PM (n = 70). Data were collected from medical records and bedside glucose monitoring. Outcomes included glycemic control metrics (mean glucose, variability, hypoglycemia), clinical outcomes (mortality, major complications, reinfarction), and length of stay. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality.
Results: Basal-Bolus therapy resulted in significantly better glycemic control, with the lowest mean glucose (156 ± 33 mg/dL), lowest glucose variability, and highest time-in-range (72%) (p < 0.001). The Sliding-Scale group showed the poorest control and highest variability. In-hospital mortality differed significantly among the groups: SS (14.5%), BB (6.3%), CI (8.0%), PM (12.8%) (p = 0.03). Basal-Bolus therapy also achieved the shortest mean length of stay (5.1 ± 2.4 days), while Sliding Scale had the longest (7.8 ± 3.1 days) (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Sliding-Scale therapy was independently associated with higher mortality (Adjusted OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.21-6.96, p = 0.016), along with higher admission glucose and increased glycemic variability.
Conclusion: Among insulin regimens used for ACS-related hyperglycemia, Basal-Bolus therapy provided superior glycemic stability and was associated with lower mortality and shorter hospitalization. Sliding-Scale insulin was linked to poor glycemic control, greater glucose variability, and independently increased mortality risk. Implementing physiologic insulin strategies-particularly Basal-Bolus-may improve outcomes in ACS patients with hyperglycemia, especially in resource-limited settings.
Keywords: Basal-Bolus Insulin; Sliding Scale; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hyperglycemia Management; In-Hospital Mortality
Abdullah Abu Lamzi., et al. “Clinical Outcomes of Different Insulin Regimens for Acute Coronary Syndrome-Related Hyperglycemia: A Multimodal Comparative Study”. EC Cardiology 10.5 (2025): 01-08.
© 2025 Abdullah Abu Lamzi., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Open Access by ECronicon is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License
Based on a work at www.ecronicon.net