EC Clinical and Medical Case Reports

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 4 - 2023

Virtual Reality Goggles as an Arsenal to Reduce ICU Delirium-Prospective Observational Study

Manimala Rao1*, Garipalli Nikilesh Kumar2 and Rana Prathap Simha C3

1Director, Medical Education and Academics, KIMS Hyderabad, Telangana, India

2Consultant Critical Care Medicine Yashoda Hospital , Somajiguda, Hyderbad, Telangana-500082

3Consultant Critical Care Medicine Sankalpa Hospital , Tata nagar, Tirupathi, Andhra pradesh -517501

*Corresponding Author: Manimala Rao, Director, Medical Education and Academics, KIMS Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Received: February 07, 2023; Published: February 22, 2023



Introduction: ICU delirium is a serious condition that results in an acute change in the mental state of critically ill patients, with disturbances to their consciousness, attention, cognition and perception. It can lead to increased lengths of stay, poor clinical outcomes, increased costs and residual psychological sequelae. We hypothesize that virtual reality (VR) may provide an ideal platform for controlled, scalable, and effective environmental manipulation in the ICU.

Aim and Objective: To study the effectiveness of VR goggles in the reduction of ICU delirium.

Materials and Methods: The OCULUS VR system was used in this study. The VR system consisted of the Oculus Go VR headset with a hand-held controller. In addition to the VR headset, patients were provided with earphones to provide the audio for the VR experience and reduce environmental noise. Both the headset and the earphones were affixed with protective sanitary covers. The CAM ICU score 7 was used to assess the delirium.The effectiveness of VR goggles to reduce the ICU delirium was evaluated during the subsequent 4 days.

Results: Fifty patients admitted to the icu were divided into two groups, one group had goggles (VR) and other the standard treatment group (CR).

The difference in mean CAM 7 scores was not statistically significant though higher in VR compared to CR on day 0 (5.0 ± 0.87 > 4.9 ± 0.95), same in both VR and CR on day 1 (4.4 ± 0.91 = 4.4 ± 0.86), slightly higher in VR compared to CR on day 2 (4.0 ± 1.00 > 3.9 ± 0.76) and lesser in VR compared to CR (3.4 ± 0.99 < 3.8 ± 0.97) on day 3. But on day 4, mean CAM 7 scores of VR (2.5 ± 1.01) was significantly lower than controls (3.3 ± 1.34) which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The decrease in CAM 7 scores from day 0 to day 4 is more in VR (2.5 ± 01) compared to CR (1.6 ± 1.60), and the difference in decrease between VR and CR were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The virtual reality goggles can be used as a simplest non pharmacological method to reduce the incidence of ICU delirium.

Keywords: Arsenal; ICU Delirium; Virtual Reality (VR)

  1. Salluh JI., et al. “Delirium epidemiology in critical care (DECCA): an international study”. Critical Care 14 (2010): R210.
  2. Cavallazzi R., et al. “Delirium in the ICU: an overview”. Annals of Intensive Care 1 (2012): 49.
  3. Bhat R and Rockwood K. “Delirium as a disorder of consciousness”. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 11 (2007): 1167-1170.
  4. Professor Alasdair MJ MacLullich., et al. “Delirium and long-term cognitive impairment”. International Review of Psychiatry 1 (2009): 30-42.
  5. Fitzgerald JM., et al. “Delirium: a disturbance of circadian integrity?” Medical Hypotheses 4 (2013): 568-576.
  6. Trzepacz PT., et al. “Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium”. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2 (2001): 229-242.
  7. Devlin JW., et al. “Delirium assessment in the critically ill”. Intensive Care Medicine 6 (2007): 929-940.
  8. Gaudreau JD., et al. “Fast, systematic, and continuous delirium assessment in hospitalized patients: the nursing delirium screening scale”. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 4 (2005): 368-375.
  9. Awissi DK., et al. “I-SAVE study: impact of sedation, analgesia, and delirium protocols evaluated in the intensive care unit: an economic evaluation”. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 1 (2012): 21-28.
  10. Goncalves CA., et al. “Biological and methodological features of the measurement of S100B,aputative marker  of            brain     injury”. Clinical Biochemistry 10-11 (2008): 755-763.
  11. Ely EW., et al. “Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)”. Critical Care Medicine 7 (2001): 1370-1379.
  12. Khan BA., et al. “The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 Delirium Severity Scale: A Novel Delirium Severity Instrument for Use in the ICU”. Critical Care Medicine 5 (2017): 851-857.
  13. Schweickert WD., et al. “Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial”. Lancet 9678 (2009): 1874-1882.
  14. Devlin JW., et al. “Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study”. Critical Care Medicine 2 (2010): 419-427.
  15. Chang LY., et al. “Influence of physical restraint on unplanned extubation of adult intensive care patients: A case-control study”. American Journal of Critical Care 17 (2008): 408-415.
  16. Gerber SM., et al. “Perception and performance on a virtual reality cognitive stimulation for use in the intensive care unit: a non-randomized trial in critically ill patients”. Frontiers in Medicine (2019): 6.
  17. Naef AC., et al. “Virtual reality stimulation to reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial”. Trials 22 (2021): 174.

Manimala Rao. Virtual Reality Goggles as an Arsenal to Reduce ICU Delirium-Prospective Observational Study. EC Clinical and Medical Case Reports   6.4 (2023): 31-36.