EC Clinical and Medical Case Reports

This research investigates the impact of vocal function exercises (VFE) versus vocal hygiene (VH) on the vocal performance of speech-language pathologists (SLPs), considering the prevalent risks of voice disorders in vocally demanding professions. A quasi-experimental design involving 20 female SLPs was conducted, with 10 participants assigned to each intervention group. The participants underwent pre-test and post-test assessments using the voice handicap index (VHI) and the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V). Statistical analyses revealed significant improvements in vocal health for both groups, indicating the effectiveness of both interventions. However, VH demonstrated a more pronounced impact on emotional aspects, while both interventions showed improvements in functional and physical domains. The findings underscore the importance of proactive measures for maintaining optimal vocal health among professional voice users, with implications for enhancing therapy outcomes and job satisfaction in vocally demanding professions.

 Keywords: Voice Disorders; Voice Handicap Index; Vocal Hygiene; Vocal Function Exercises; The Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

1. Lyberg-Åhlander V., et al. “Prevalence of voice disorders in the general population, based on the Stockholm public health cohort”. Journal of Voice6 (2019): 900-905.
2. Voice disorders”. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (n.d.).
3. Stemple JC., et al. “Clinical voice pathology: Theory and management (6^th edition)”. Plural Publishing (2020).
4. Angadi V., et al. “Effects of vocal function exercises: A systematic review”. Journal of Voice1 (2019): 124.e13-124.e34.
5. Smith JK. “Vocal health and hygiene for speech-language pathologists”. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology2 (2023): 45-58.
6. International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). World Health Organization (n.d.).
7. Kempster GB., et al. “Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol”. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology2 (2009): 124-132.
8. Jacobson BH., et al. “The voice handicap index (VHI): Development and validation”. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology3 (1997): 66-70.
9. Saleem AF and Natour YS. “Standardization of the Arabic version of the voice handicap index: An investigation of validity and reliability”. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology4 (2010): 183-188.
10. Couch S., et al. “Vocal effectiveness of speech-language pathology students: Before and after voice use during service delivery”. South African Journal of Communication Disorders1 (2015): E1-E7.
11. Cielo CA., et al. “Vocal symptoms of future professional voice users”. Revista CEFAC1 (2015): 34-43.
12. IBM - United States. SPSS statistics - Overview (n.d.).
13. Bane M., et al. “Vocal function exercises for normal voice: The effects of varying dosage”. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology1 (2019): 37-45.
14. Bevans R. “An introduction to the two-way ANOVA”. Scribbr (2022).
15. Nemr K., et al. “GRBAS and Cape-V scales: High reliability and consensus when applied at different times”. Journal of Voice 6 (2012): 812.e17-812.e22.